The Whole Iceberg

Dear fellow pursuer of the Truth #1  I have a habit of thinking about a third choice when I am presented with two.  Because usually, the wise choice is usually neither of the extreme. I am not saying 'middle-way' is always the truth, but when dealing with the truth, the radical claim should be supported with enough evidence.  It was my life-time's goal to create something to help my atheistic friends consider the possibility they deny. And instead of choosing between 'what one group claims' and 'what the other group claims', I wanted to ask my friends to start the journey themselves, but rarely, the people lacking the needs in their peaceful time are likely to start that seemingly boring research.  When people lack the motive to pursue the truth, I think the least I can do is to present a data for comparison. If people concludes differently based on the same data, it is either one side is misinterpreting the data; or the data itself has the nature of multi-d...

A peaceful greeting and an invitation to the quest for the Truth I want to start by pointing out that I am not here to attack or disdain the believers of the KJV-Onlyism, nor the Churches which adopted this view which many people consider to be, if not a conspiracy, a controversy. As a fellow follower of the Truth and the Wisdom incarnated, I merely want to share my journey and the findings how KJV-onlyism made sense to the people. And by tracking down the history and the logical consistency of the arguments, I wanted to see which makes more sense. I wanted to see what could be the possible misunderstandings that may have led its believers to their unique conclusion. I can respect an individual belief towards the certain understanding of the part of the Bible which may differ due to the background of personal belief and preferences. But if your belief is the very radical one that disqualifies others’ beliefs on the history of the Bible and its teaching? I have to ask you if you h...